Public UN Debate About The Hague TribunalNov 20th, 2012 | By De-Construct.net | In Controversy, Current, Earlier
Ad Hoc Tribunals Public Debate in the UN Scheduled for April 2013
United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) President Vuk Jeremić has called a public debate for April 10, 2013 on the role and performance of international ad hoc criminal tribunals founded by the UN in achieving justice and reconciliation among nations.
Acquittal of Croat War Criminals Blow to the UN Reputation
The debate is a reaction to the decision of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) Appeals Chamber to acquit former Croatian generals Ante Gotovina and Mladen Markač. In Jeremić’s opinion, the acquittal struck a blow to the UN’s reputation.
The decision of the Appeals Chamber of the Hague Tribunal related to Operation Storm understandably caused indignation in many parts of the world. It is an undeniable fact that about a quarter of a million Serbs were driven out of their homes in the space of only several days, and that the court, set up to investigate such misdeeds, in effect decided that no one was guilty or responsible. This could lead to a conclusion that no crime in fact took place, which evidently stands in contrast with reality, Jeremić said in the release.
Jeremić believes that a full understanding of the work of the ICTY and its consequences must be accessible to the wide international public, so that history can have the final say, and so that it never happens anywhere again that evil deeds are pardoned and declared a virtue.
He said that considering that the UN was the founder of ad-hoc courts, he had decided to schedule the public debate to discuss their performance and the level to which they fulfill their original purpose.
It is my personal opinion that the decision of the Appeals Chamber of the Hague Tribunal has dealt a blow to the reputation of the United Nations, but I allow for the possibility that as a member of the nation whose expulsion was legalized by this act, I may be somewhat subjective on this issue, said the UNGA president.
UN Debate Open to International Law Experts and Associations
The debate will be open not only to states, but also to the academic community, distinguished individuals and civil associations, Jeremić said.
Jeremić said he was strongly convinced that reconciliation and a fresh start in relations between feuding nations cannot be based on denial and glorification of crime, because that essentially represents an incentive for crimes to be repeated.
This is why I have scheduled a debate entitled ‘The role of the international judiciary in achieving reconciliation’ for April 10, 2013 at the UNGA in New York, concluded Jeremić.
Integral Text of Jeremić’s Release
The decision of the Hague Tribunal’s Appeals Chamber in regards to the Operation Storm caused understandable indignation in many parts of the world. It is an undeniable fact that about a quarter of a million Serbs were driven out of their homes in the space of only several days, and that the court, set up to investigate such crimes, in effect decided that no one was guilty or responsible for this act.
Subsequently, this could lead to a conclusion that in fact no crime took place, which evidently stands in contrast with reality.
I believe that the full insight in the workings of the Hague tribunal and its consequences must be accessible to the wide international public, in order to enable history to reach its final conclusion, and so that it never happens anywhere again that evil deeds are pardoned and declared a virtue.
This is why I have decided to exercise the powers of the President of the UN General Assembly and schedule a public debate about the role of the international ad hoc crime tribunals in attaining justice and reconciliation among the nations. Considering that the UN itself was the founder of ad hoc tribunals, I believe it is appropriate to discuss their performance right here, as well as debate about the degree to which such tribunals have fulfilled their initial purpose.
It is my personal opinion the decision of the Hague Tribunal’s Appeals Chamber has struck a blow to the UN reputation, but being a member of the nation whose expulsion from their homesteads was legalized by this act, I allow the possibility that I may be somewhat subjective on this issue.
For this reason, I will open the UN General Assembly Debate for the wide public and allow not only states, but also the academic community, distinguished individuals and civic associations to take part.
I am strongly convinced true reconciliation and turning a new page in relations between the feuding nations cannot be established upon denial and glorification of crimes, because that essentially represents an incentive for crimes to be repeated. This is why I have scheduled a debate entitled ‘The role of the international judiciary in achieving reconciliation’ for April 10, 2013 at the UNGA in New York.
Links to Related Articles in Serbian Media
Being that the information about the upcoming public UN debate doesn’t seem to deserve attention of the Western mainstream media, here is some of the coverage from the Serbian press (in English), including the early attempts to prevent the debate taking place:
Pocar: Fatal errors of ICTY
UNGA to hold public debate in wake of Hague ruling
Jeremić: Pressure will not make me cancel debate
Vuk Jeremić schedules debate on Hague Tribunal at UN
Hague judge says justice has not been served
Malta News, Judge Carmel Agius
Judge hits out at ‘confusing, extremely problematic’ acquittal of Gotovina, Markac
Related PDF Documents, ICTY
- Krajina Anniversary: Bloodbath and Champagne
- Kusturica: Gotovina the Next Nobel Peace Prize Laureate?
Those who think general Gotovina story ends here are mistaken. I’m afraid we are in for new surprises. Mostly due to the humanitarian character of the international community.
Humanitarian Character of the International Community
The international community has been accustomizing us to humane bombs and angelic forms of war. In the end, the international community and its organizations knew how to reward guardians of the world peace.
We don’t know what was all that for which the judge earlier blasted general Gotovina with 24 years in prison. It must have been a heavy crime. But this one who unblasted him now surely has a vision. What’s worse, he’s done nothing if the whole thing ends with the acquittal. It can easily happen that they go further, guided by their humanitarian ideas.
- Devastating Storm
- In Memory of the Operation Storm Victims 2
- Croatian President Ordered Genocide
- Croats Systematically Destroyed Serbian Population
- Croat Army and Government Ordered Carnage
- In Memory of the Operation Storm Victims
- Tudjman’s Police Minister Admits Croatia Started the War by Attacking…
In the exclusive interview, Franjo Tuđman’s Internal Affairs Minister Josip Boljkovac admitted Croat leadership carried out planned attacks on Croatia Serbs in 1991, in order to start a war. “Tuđman wanted the war at any cost, following the concept according to which Serbs must disappear from Croatia,” Boljkovac said.